JP Morgan went to prison for this (from Behind the Markets)

Elon Musk just threw his two-decade Mars obsession out the window.

On Super Bowl Sunday, while most Americans were watching commercials, the SpaceX CEO dropped a bombshell that's reshaping the entire commercial space race. 

Mars missions? Delayed at least 5-7 years. The new target? A "self-growing city" on the Moon, achievable in under a decade.

This isn't a slight course correction. This is Musk doing a complete 180 on what he's called SpaceX's core mission since 2002.

Here's what just happened.

The Timeline That Kept Moving

SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

Musk's Mars promises have always been... flexible.

2016: SpaceX would land on Mars by 2018.
2017: Make that 2022 instead.
2020: "Highly confident" humans on Mars by 2026.
2025: Five uncrewed Starships launching in 2026.
February 2026: Never mind all that. We're doing the Moon first.

The pattern is clear. Every few years, the target moves further out. But this time it's different. Musk isn't just postponing Mars. He's actively deprioritizing it.

And the numbers behind this decision tell the real story.

The xAI Factor: When AI Meets Space

But here's the part most people are missing.

This pivot wasn't just about launch windows. Last week, SpaceX acquired xAI in a merger that created a $1.25 trillion entity. Suddenly, Musk's space company and his AI company are the same thing.

And that changes the mission.

At an xAI all-hands meeting, Musk unveiled plans that sound like science fiction:

  • AI satellite factories on the lunar surface

  • Electromagnetic mass drivers to launch satellites from the Moon

  • Orbital data centers handling sophisticated AI computing

  • Solar panel and radiator manufacturing using lunar resources

The Moon isn't just a backup plan for humanity anymore. It's becoming the manufacturing hub for Musk's AI empire.

Think about it. No atmosphere. Lower gravity. Unlimited solar power. The Moon offers advantages for satellite production that Earth simply can't match. And with AI computing requiring massive cooling and power infrastructure, orbital data centers start making real economic sense.

This isn't about inspiring humanity anymore. This is about infrastructure.

AD Behind The Markets

Trump’s Midnight Ultimatum

Video preview

America is at a crossroads.

One executive order from Trump could reshape the nation overnight.

25% tax is just the beginning…

What comes next could shake the entire economy.

Here's how you can protect yourself >>>

The NASA Connection 

SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Here's another detail that matters.

SpaceX already has a $4 billion contract with NASA to build the lunar lander for Artemis III. The mission goal? Put astronauts back on the Moon by 2028.

Musk was building Moon technology anyway. He just wasn't calling it the priority.

But now NASA's newly installed administrator is Jared Isaacman—a billionaire tech CEO who's already flown on SpaceX capsules twice. He's considered a Musk ally. And suddenly, SpaceX's lunar focus aligns perfectly with NASA's timeline.

Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin is building their own lunar lander that doesn't require orbital refueling. Starship needs 10-12 tanker flights just to fill up before heading to the Moon. Blue Origin's simpler design could land humans there first.

Competition matters. And Musk doesn't like losing.

The Starship Problem Nobody's Talking About

Elon Musk presents his Mars colonization vision at the International Astronautical Congress (Tim Dodd/Spaceflight)

Let's talk about the elephant in the room.

Starship still hasn't successfully reached space and returned intact. The rocket that's supposed to revolutionize space travel keeps having "surprise explosions" and liquid oxygen leaks.

SpaceX's website still claims they're "planning to launch the first Starships to Mars in 2026." But that's looking increasingly unrealistic when the vehicle can't even complete basic orbital tests reliably.

The technical challenges are brutal:

  • Orbital refueling has never been demonstrated at scale

  • Cryogenic propellant transfer between spacecraft remains untested

  • Landing on uneven surfaces without prepared pads is completely new

  • Multi-month deep space missions require life support systems that don't exist yet

Every expert interview mentions the same thing: Musk's timelines are aspirational at best.

By focusing on the Moon, SpaceX buys itself time to solve these problems with a closer, more forgiving target. And if something goes wrong? Help is only 3 days away, not 6 months.

AD Awesomely

Every tax season, millions of Americans unknowingly leave money on the table.

The IRS? They’re not exactly in a rush to tell you about it. 😏

But here’s what you need to know before filing your taxes:

There’s a little-known government loophole quietly sending out checks worth $885.56, $1,248.33… even $2,061.21—not as refunds, but as FREE MONEY.

  • No complicated paperwork
  • No need to change how you file
  • No accountant required

And the best part? You could start collecting as soon as tomorrow.

One guy I know cashes in over 650 of these checks a year, and I convinced him to spill the beans in this short video.

!Before you file your taxes, watch this:

See How to Claim Your Check

P.S. The IRS won’t send you a memo about this. But if you’re reading this email, consider this your wake-up call.

"Self-Growing City" on the Moon

Musk keeps using this phrase: "self-growing city."

What does that even mean?

Based on xAI meeting notes and Musk's X posts, we can piece it together:

  1. Initial robots (likely Tesla Optimus) land first

  2. Power plants and basic infrastructure get installed

  3. Manufacturing facilities start producing solar cells, radiators, and satellite components

  4. Electromagnetic launchers begin sending products to orbit

  5. Each cycle generates resources for the next expansion phase

The "self-growing" part means the city funds its own expansion by manufacturing and launching commercial products. It's not just a scientific outpost. It's an industrial base.

And that's why the AI merger matters so much. The lunar city doesn't exist to inspire humanity. It exists to manufacture the backbone of Musk's AI satellite constellation.

Mars Mission

Musk says SpaceX will return to Mars planning in "about five to seven years."

Should we believe him?

History suggests skepticism. But this time might actually be different.

If the Moon city generates revenue through satellite production, it could self-fund Mars missions. The economics flip from "expensive science project" to "profitable expansion."

Plus, technology developed for lunar manufacturing—life support, construction robots, in-situ resource utilization—transfers directly to Mars. The Moon becomes the testing ground for technologies that make Mars possible.

That's actually smarter than the original plan of jumping straight to Mars.

Musk just delayed Mars missions 5-7 years to build a Moon city first. Smart strategy or admission of failure?

Login or Subscribe to participate

The Space Race

China is watching. So is Russia. And now Blue Origin.

Geopolitical competition around lunar development just intensified. If SpaceX establishes manufacturing infrastructure on the Moon first, they control a massive strategic advantage.

The next decade of space exploration won't be about flags and footprints. It'll be about industrial capacity and commercial infrastructure.

And Musk just repositioned SpaceX to win that race.

The Reality Check

Let's be clear about one thing.

None of this is guaranteed. Musk's predictions have missed the mark repeatedly. Starship could take another five years just to work reliably. The economics of lunar manufacturing might not pan out. NASA's Artemis program could face delays that cascade across the entire industry.

But what changed this week wasn't the technology. It was the strategic priority.

For 20+ years, Musk told everyone Mars was the mission. The ultimate goal. The reason SpaceX exists.

Now he's saying the Moon comes first. That's not a small shift. That's acknowledging reality.

And maybe that's the most important signal of all. When visionaries start admitting their original timelines were wrong, when they start choosing pragmatism over inspiration, when they start building revenue-generating infrastructure instead of just planting flags...

That's when things actually start happening.

Bottom Line

Mars is real. It's just on hold while SpaceX builds the financial and technical foundation that makes it possible.

The Moon city isn't about giving up on Mars. It's about finally having a realistic path to get there.

Whether Musk delivers on the 10-year Moon timeline or the 5-7 year Mars return remains to be seen. His track record suggests adding a few years to any estimate.

But one thing's certain: The space race just changed direction. And SpaceX is betting everything that closer is better than farther.

Time will tell if they're right.

Musk claims a self-growing Moon city in 10 years. Based on his Mars track record, when will it actually happen?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Subscribe to ETF Alert for real-time market news. 

We track the trends that move billions, before they hit mainstream headlines.

What's catching investor attention today: "Groundhog Day": Zelensky Torches Europe's Defense Inaction
Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before investing.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading